| Sugar falls | Relief comes | Time strains | Skies lighten | Wonder palls | Passion drums | Heart drains | Eyes brighten | Virtues sleep | Heroes wake | Lies slicken | Wise listen | Statues weep | Rivals brake | Clouds thicken | Teeth glisten | Hollow rises | Gaggles rest | Space ends | Waves applaud | Evil sizes | Comrades jest | Truth offends | Hopes afford | Laughter clogs | Troubles ease | Kings reckon | Air sweetens | Recall fogs | Memories please | Graves beckon | Time seasons | Never enough | Bursting with life | To feed the appetite | Like a new-born baby | Always too much | Seeing the truth | To focus on the right | With no if’s or maybe’s | Allure too great | Holding the peace | So enthralled by the might | And doing so daily | Go on this way | Such is our task | And say goodbye to light. | We perform most ably. |
Downs and Ups
Six Unbankably Versatile Actors
Films stink. They really do. Especially films made by Hollywood.
It must have something to do with money. It costs a lot of money to make a film, and then a lot of money to promote it, so funding a film is like taking two big gambles before you see either pay off. As a consequence, the people with the money try to make the safest bets. Which is why Seth Rogen appears in so many films. You know there must be something wrong with a world where Seth Rogen is rich and famous.
Somehow, for reasons that I would rather not understand, Seth Rogen is bankable. To be bankable, it is good to be consistent. Consistency means the audience gets what they wanted, and will know what they get next time. Seth Rogen has been the same in every film he appeared in, since he fluked that minor part as the stockroom guy in 40 Year Old Virgin. He has played the same useless boring lump in every film since, including the ones he wrote, which tells you something about both his writing and acting range. When Seth Rogen plays an alien, or a cop, a gelatinous mutant, or a comedian, his performances are identical, and equally unfunny. But Seth Rogan is bankable.
I guess some American teens in nowhere towns, high on weed or aerosol cheese, like to watch Seth Rogen because he is a useless goon made good. Or maybe Rogen is sufficiently middle of the road that men do not mind taking women to date movies that feature him. Sometimes ordinary people like stars because they are attainably attractive. Not only is Seth Rogen attainably attractive, he is attainably funny. Anyone can imagine themselves as witty and as good-looking as Seth Rogen, which says everything you need to know about the man’s comedy-based career.
Whilst Seth Rogen is bankable, and hence appears in lots of films as exactly what the audience expect him to be, you sometimes see films which contain a completely different kind of performer. They are called actors and they are noticeably different because they can act. Or rather, they are unnoticeably different, because audiences may not notice them. The actors are so busy acting, that the audience cannot recognize them from one film to another, and will not pay to see them. Even if they do recognize the actor, they are not sure what the actor will do from one movie to the next. Such unpredictability makes the actors unbankable, whilst untouchable. Think of Mark Wahlberg, and Anne Hathaway, and Jamie Foxx, and Tom Cruise. Then think of people who are the opposite of them, if you can. The ones who acted them off the screen, but maybe do not look as good. The people who were in that really good film you saw, but who you do not know the name of, and you do not recognize. They are the actors I am talking about. And if you could not think of any of them, here is a list of six of the best from Hollywood. Look out for them, coming to a movie screen near you soon…
1. Colm Meaney
On the big screen, this Irish actor has played Benjamin Franklin, H.L. Mencken, and Leeds United Manager Don Revie. He has played London mobsters, American mayors, and Welsh busy-bodies. He was a plumy English pilot in Die Hard 2, was consumed with hate in How Harry Became a Tree and was the azz-kicking DEA agent in Con Air. With five of his films currently in post-production, expect to see plenty more of Colm Meaney in future.
2. Franka Potente
This German actress first attained some international prominence for playing the lead in Lola Rennt a crafty film in which Potente literally runs through three different versions of the same story. She entered the English-speaking mainstream with appearances alongside Johnny Depp in Blow and playing the love interest for Matt Damon in The Bourne Identity. Though often stunning to watch, Potente is in a different class to the eye candy that clutter so many films. She was exceptional when playing the female lead in Australian film Romulus, My Father and her supporting role in Che: Part 2 demanded attention for its nuanced subtlety, as well as demonstrating that language is no barrier to Potente’s acting. If her acting career was not enough, Potente is also a published author. This fascinating woman is bound to engage audiences for many years to come.
3. Chris Cooper
Cooper is another Bourne alumnus, making a name for himself through gritty roles in spy drama Breach and playing a homophobic ex-soldier in American Beauty. Often content to be secondary to the movie stars, Cooper got deserved recognition for Adaptation, a film that almost fell apart through its excessive cleverness, but was held together by its strong performances. However, I most enjoyed Cooper for one of his rare leading performances, as Sheriff Sam Deeds in Lone Star. This masterful ensemble piece sees Cooper stitching together both clues and characters in a mystery that straddles the border of Mexico and the US. Cooper makes Sheriff Deeds personable, down to earth and humane, which is a sharp contrast to many of the other roles Cooper has played. Hollywood’s obsession with looks and stereotypes may sometimes have held Cooper back. With some luck, there will be more roles to stretch Cooper’s range in future.
4. Forest Whitaker
![]()
Perhaps Whitaker is too well known to belong in this list, but his un-Hollywood looks and talent for transformation set Whitaker apart. His drooping eyelid seems to transcend his face, and somehow becomes intrinsic to his characters. However he is cast, Whitaker has had the ability to immerse himself in his part, and hence discover and present a whole new person to the audience. Whether he is playing jazz great Charlie Parker in Bird, a samurai hitman in Ghost Dog or Idi Amin in The Last King of Scotland, it is impossible to tell where the character ends and Whitaker begins.
5. Toni Collette
![]()
Even more than Whitaker, Toni Collette has the ability to utterly transform herself from one role to the next, making this chameleon actress’ talents almost invisible to the ignorant eye. Like Whitaker, Collette transcends Hollywood’s obsession with looks, and is able to inject an irresistible believability into her characters. Her best known roles have been in Muriel’s Wedding, The Sixth Sense, About a Boy and Little Miss Sunshine. Whatever part she plays, Collette is never less than excellent, and always raises the standard of the film.
6. Vincent D’Onofrio
With his extraordinary ability to mutate from one part to the next, Vincent D’Onofrio is the absolute opposite of a Hollywood star. Even when you know who he is, it is hard to believe some of his characters were played by the same man. As Private Pyle in Full Metal Jacket, he was utterly convincing as a character that goes from mommy’s boy-cum-retard to deeply scary killer in less than a third of the film. In The Player he gave a wonderful and convincing turn as the angry and paranoid screenwriter murdered by Tim Robbins’ lead character. D’Onofrio then went on to appear alien, comic and scary, whilst playing the flesh-wearing nemesis to the Men in Black. He then amped up the duality he delivered in Full Metal Jacket, playing a laid-back geek taken over by the consciousness of a homicidal 20’s barman in the under-appreciated The Thirteenth Floor. Whilst film fame eluded him, D’Onofrio has attained mainstream television success in the US, through his leading role in one of the Law & Order stable. TV’s gain is film’s loss, though D’Onofrio continues to appear in big screen oddities and bit parts from time to time. But maybe the best of D’Onofrio is yet to come. His television popularity has helped D’Onofrio to land some interesting roles in some very interesting new films. Keep a look out for this ultimate actor’s actor, who may yet become a fan favourite.
The Pitiful, Lyrical, and Least of the Political
Everybody loves a winner, or so the saying goes. Little affectionate attention is left for those who come last, and this is especially true of the great political race that lies at the heart of modern representative democracies. These democracies could not function without losers. When voters complain that their government is full of liars, or cheats, or morons, then they should look to each other. In a democracy, any one of us can stand, and win, though most will lose. People rarely stand in order to lose, though some do. To understand democracy, perhaps we need to occasionally pay some thought to who those losers are. In a previous blog, I wrote about the political parties that came rock bottom in the 2010 UK General Election. However, vote counts do not tell the whole story. So I went to one public resource where every British political party not only can, but must make a statement: the statements of accounts as required by the Electoral Commission. As with any accounting reports, nothing prohibits the party from divulging more than is needed, or giving extra commentary, or just using the opportunity to provide any explanation of the year’s events that they think appropriate. By now, any party should have submitted their 2010 accounts, though the most lax will inevitably fail to meet their obligations. I went through the returns to find stories from those political parties whose stories are rarely heard, and arguably do not deserve to be. This is what I found…
This Dutch party defies description, so I will let their annual filing speak (at length) for itself. This is how they reviewed their political activities during the year:
When the PLC Party was formed in March 1983, the Founder focused on the year 2010 as the year that MIRACLE would descend on the Houses of Parliament and so, when some MPs were caught dancing on banana skins, members of the Party’s Planning and Development Committee saw an opportunity to field some 425 Candidates. Then, we had to look for money.
The Leader of the Party has always recognised himself as a Reluctant Representative of God on earth. He was looking for an amount in the region of £13,750,000.
…
Seven officers of the Rotterdam-Rijnmond Regional Police force gained unlawful entry into the registered address of the Party.
…
On 24/25 March 2010 the Leader was taken to a prison ship, known as “DE KALMER” in South Holland. The ship housed some 1200 Blacks. There were no blondes, blonds or peroxides. They were all Black.
For 3 months the Leader was fed on bread and tea for breakfase, bread and tea for lunch and more snacks for evening meal.
On the 6 May 2010, the day of the General Election in the UK, the leader was taken to Den Haag, to the Police HQ. In a small office on the ground floor, he was introduced to a black woman, wearing a Sharapova Trade mark ear ring – one of the ear rings was missing, presumably in a bed somewhere on the way to work!
Her name is MARGARET I. IGBINABARO. She turned out to be a Nigerian diplomat. Her diplomatic mission in Europe was to issue bogus EMERGENCY CERTIFICATES in respect of any Black person, introduced to her by the Dutch “foreign police”.
The leader was introduced to Miss M.I.I. As a result of that introduction, the Leader was bundled on to Flight KL 587 – Amsterdam Schiphol to a destination unknown, until, of course, the plane landed at Murtala Mohammed International Airport, Lagos, Nigeria.
So, 51 years after he left Nigeria, the Leader of the PLC found himself in the Wilderness, his political ambition in a shredder. But the old man will bounce back
Decide for yourself what that was all about. However, I can convey one pertinent fact. The PLC’s fund raising fell exactly £13,750,000 short of their £13,750,000 target.
The True English (Poetry) Party
This party seems to consist of exactly one member, Michael George Gibson, a poet who seems to be upset that other people write ‘word-things’ that lack rhymes and metre, and that they then call them ‘poems’. This has turned political, as explained in the annual report:
Trying to stir things up generally in the ‘poetry world’ and present a simple technical definition of poetry as an art of measure and rhythm. A letter was sent to the Rt. Hon. Jeremy Hunt MP.
Women have a voice, but this is not it. They failed to update the reporting template, which means their overview reads as follows:
Insert Party’s Name
This should include a brief report of the main political activities undertaken and how the party has responded to any important events during the year.
To be fair, the party did not spend much money. Its expenditure was £25 on registering to be a political party… and nothing else.
In contrast to the silent women, British Jobs First had the decency to explain that they were ‘dormant’. The prospects for British jobs must very bleak if it depends on the political campaigning of this party, because, as they explained in the statement signed 6th March 2011:
… we are both away till the New Year.
Are they working overseas?
The Anti-Political Political Party
It is possible to take a joke, or apathy, too far. The Anti-Politicals were another group who had nothing to say for themselves. In fact, their accounts said they raised and spent no money whatsoever – not even the mandatory fee for registering a party… so why bother filing an annual report?
ENG: The English National Group
This party did not do much, but they did it with a sense of humour:
The party has responded to important events with a combination of frustration and incomprehension at the activity of others.
Despite the silly name, this party is very clear about its objectives and how to realize them in a way consistent with their principles:
At the election on 6th May, we polled fewer votes than expected and came last of all six contenders at Dartford. The rest of the year was spent fund raising to re-fill the Partys depleted Purse. At Christmas Alan Munro was voted best Dame for the second year.
The Market Personified
A friend of mine asked me a question: “if the free market is a person, what would the person be like?” Here is my answer.
The market is the embodiment of everybody, in aggregate. The market is everyman, the most precisely calculated mean average of humanity.
I know you will probably hate my answer. Being nearly forty years old, my answer is part of my weltanschauung, and the only way to counter it would be the same way those US Navy SEALS countered Osama Bin Laden’s weltanschauung. I have no choice but to share my weltanschauung honestly.
I like that word, by the way. Welt-an-schau-ung. The Nazis had a weltanschauung. That is not a reason to like weltanschauungs, but it proves that weltanschauungs are serious. They are far more serious than mere worldviews. Worldviews are ten a penny. But I digress.
I am a lefty who is disaffected with the left, or as I prefer to see it, I am like Rick Blaine, Humphrey Bogart’s character in Casablanca. Rick knew how he wanted the world to be. He kept on helping the rebels, supplying them with weapons, so they could go on fighting for justice and freedom, even though they did not pay as well as the (victorious) other side. Okay, that does not sound very moral, but it is better than taking the bigger of the two pay packets. Rick also wanted to bed the hot Swede but she was married to another guy, so he helped them to escape the Nazis and their weltanschauung, which differed from his own.
Like Rick, I like to think that I do a bit here and a bit there, in the hopes of making the world very slightly better than it was before my bit was done. But, like Rick, I am inclined to see myself as just one man in the throng. Often the great mass of humanity seems to be pushing in the wrong directions, for reasons that they do not appreciate and hence cannot consciously change. It is within this context that we can personify the hydra-headed market.
The market is the old woman receiving her modest pension, oblivious to how it was fattened through productivity improvements in a Cambodian sweat shop. The market is the life assurance policy paid for by the doting family man, which in turn is invested in gensakis which provide finance to the Scotch whisky distilleries so beloved of Japanese salarymen who get drunk and beat their wives. The market is George Clooney, grinning away as he sips a Nespresso whilst filming a TV ad, not caring if Nestle’s advertising of baby milk really does encourage the needless death of one and half million children each year.
The market is a man in the airport. He is stopped by a journalist, and asked if he minds about security checks (and by implication, the tax he pays for them). His answer is: “no I don’t mind, because it’s better to be safe than sorry”. But nobody asks him if that money would have been better spent on mosquito nets, because every day the number of under five’s dying from malaria equals the total number of people killed by 9-11.
The market is the woman who buys a pre-packed salad from Tesco’s because it is healthy and convenient, and then rides home on their bike because it is better for the environment. She does not know that the salad was transported by truck from central Europe because that makes better economic sense for Tesco’s supply chain, meaning that every calorie the shopper burns riding their bike required the burning of 1000 calories of diesel to bring the salad to her.
And the market is that kid from Alabama who joined the military because of a lack of better job alternatives, and who went on to get selected as a Navy SEAL.
The market is any man, or woman, who sees into the future like men and women see the future. They might have poor eyesight, or they might be looking in the wrong direction, or they might have closed their eyes, or it might be night, and their torch might be broken. Maybe something is in the way, or they need a new prescription for their glasses. Or maybe the future is seen by an optimistic young man with 20/20 vision, sat upon a mountaintop on a clear and sunny day, whilst holding a pair of binoculars”¦ but even he can only see so far. The market suffers a lack of vision like we all suffer a lack of vision. And by now, given the length of this post, the average kid would have noted tl;dr whilst most other people just stopped reading without knowing what tl;dr stands for. So even if I am correct, it does not mean I could ever effectively communicate this idea to others. That is my personification of the market, which is the personification of people in aggregate.
The people see what they see, they hear what they hear. Their actions have consequences, but they may not be able to tell what those consequences are. The market is just the cumulative agent of their individual actions, in the same way that a person’s personality is represented by the clothes that they wear, their jewelery, the books on their shelves, their car, their holiday destination and their ringtone, all of which were acquired through the market. The consequences of their choices ripple on across time and space, across borders, changing the lives of people in faraway places. Those consequences may pollute the planet for future generations, or kill their children with second-hand smoke. They may acquire nuclear reactors designed to withstand catastrophes that occur once in a thousand years, and then be surprised when just such a catastrophe happens tomorrow.
Consequences may travel on indefinitely, but the eyes and ears and minds of the market can only travel so far. The market is no more Hitler than it is the man on the Clapham omnibus. At least one of Hitler’s paintings must have been bought by somebody nice. The average Joe, Uncle Jo Stalin, Joe the Plumber”¦ they are all part of the market, no matter how much they pretend otherwise. It may be comforting to see the world in terms of heroes and villains, but if the market is a villain, then it can only be because people are generally villainous, or at best that they are generally negligent of the consequences of their choices.
Sorry about that. Like I said, the answer is part of my weltanschauung. A weltanschauung is for life, not just for Christmas. But it does not take much to see that the problems of [insert number here] little people do not amount to a hill of beans in this crazy world. The market will never be truly reformed unless we all learn to work together in our best collective interests. On that day, there would be no more buyers and sellers, only a single family of mankind, seeing clearly, and not needing a marketplace in order to exchange what they can give for what they want and need.
It is true that the free market is often despicable. The free market despises us back, valuing us only according to what we can supply, and who wants it. But as the character of Ugarte says to Rick in Casablanca:
You know, Rick, I have many a friend in Casablanca, but somehow, just because you despise me, you are the only one I trust.
And that is the market personified.
Angry Teachers Make Easy Pray… I mean “Prey”
The British government recently announced their intention to cut the guidelines for school trips from 140 pages to 8 pages. I, like a lot of teachers, was surprised to find this move might be unpopular with teacher’s unions. Did the unions intend the startling inference drawn by most of the public – that the unions represent teachers who must be dullards? It is difficult to imagine the kind of person who would rather read another 132 pages of guidance in preference to exercising their own judgment. Thankfully, a lot of teachers publicly pooh-poohed the unions. Sadly, other teachers defended the inanity of the unions. Both sides made their arguments by posting comments to the BBC’s news site; see here. However, in this debate, there was only one clear winner. The teachers conspired to cunningly reinforce the beliefs of everyone who thinks teachers really are dunderheads who barely scraped through their own education. Their atrocious English spoke more loudly about the faults of the education system than their ill-constructed arguments ever will.
From around 140 comments posted to the BBC’s site, maybe a third came from people identifying themselves as teachers. Of the comments from teachers, these are the four worst howlers:
I just checked and I spent 10 weekends this academic year taking my students on visits. This means I am unable to spend time with my wife, my children and after seen the comments posted by parents…
That teacher also needs to spend more time with his dictionary.
I have run many school trips in my time. H&S has never stopped me beacuse i use common sense to assess the suitibility for taking 60+ children. However cost has. Extra curricular enrichment is the first to go when budgets are being squeezed but these often provide the richest learning oppertunities and are the best platform for learning because they inspire & excite. however no money= less trips
Oh dear. As well as terrible spelling, this teacher missed the commas that must come after “however”. I well remember learning that at school.
Tony Fisher, no. 18, I can only assume you’re either a member of the slow writers club or you work at the most stupid school in the land. This is certainly not indicative of the four school’s I’ve worked in.
It is a real shame this idiot did not name the four schools that employ teachers who do not know when to use apostrophes.
As a teacher I run 4 or 5 trips a year to museums and other ventues. From the behaviour and attitude of most people I meet as a teacher I can say that most are not able to supervise there own children in a socially correct manner. Before anyone else “has a go at winging teacers” I advise you to organise a trip for 60 children. Think about the diabet child, the deaf child, the partially signed, etc
You may give the benefit of the doubt to errors that could be typographical, but there is no excusing the confusion of “there” with “their”.
It is very easy to mock teachers for their poor English. Not just easy, but also a lot of fun. The best part is that they thoroughly deserve to be mocked. Quite a lot of the comments noted how hard teachers work. Obviously people need to work extra hard if their talents are so limited that they make fools of themselves when trying to construct a few simple sentences. One can only imagine how many teachers choose not to post to websites, for fear it will lead to humiliation and embarrassment… I mean embarressment, of course.
Failing That…
I need a nap. Failing that, a powernap. Failing that, a coffee. Failing that, a smoke. Failing that, some sugar. Failing that, a holiday. Failing that, a new job. Failing that, early retirement. Failing that, a moan, which now I’ve had.
I need a haircut. Failing that, lots of gel. Failing that, a hat. Failing that, low light. Failing that, no light. Failing that, blind friends. Failing that, a beautiful and understanding girlfriend. Failing that, a blind girlfriend. Failing that, to stay in the house, which I did.
I need more time. Failing that, more time management. Failing that, a time machine. Failing that, more time-saving gadgets. Failing that, less to do. Failing that, servants. Failing that, trained animals. Failing that, to get up early. Failing that, to stay up late, which I did, and is why I need a nap.
I need new purpose in life. Failing that, a new life. Failing that, a new love interest. Failing that, a pet. Failing that, a pot plant. Failing that, to move. Failing that, to redecorate. Failing that, more TV channels. Failing that, to change the channel, and I might as well, as I stayed in anyway.
I need to win the lottery. Failing that, a rich relative to die. Failing that, a pay raise. Failing that, a new job. No wait, I failed that already. I need to stop thinking like this. Failing that, I should think this faster. That way, it will finish sooner. And now it has.
