<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Halfthoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://halfthoughts.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://halfthoughts.com</link>
	<description>By Eric Priezkalns.  About anything, everything and nothing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:35:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Every Fool is on TV by Dan Baker</title>
		<link>http://halfthoughts.com/videos/every-fool-is-on-tv/#comment-15003</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://halfthoughts.com/?post_type=video&#038;p=3333#comment-15003</guid>
		<description>I figured this was going to be predictable.   But the multiplication came as a surprise.  A funny surprise.  Well Done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I figured this was going to be predictable.   But the multiplication came as a surprise.  A funny surprise.  Well Done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The GOP and the Labour Party: Uncanny Similarities by Dan Baker</title>
		<link>http://halfthoughts.com/2012/02/11/the-gop-and-the-labour-party-uncanny-similarities/#comment-15002</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://halfthoughts.com/?p=3543#comment-15002</guid>
		<description>Eric,

It’s an interesting analysis.   But I wouldn’t paint the picture so dark for Republicans, nor that bright for Obama either. 

The media and Republican elite have been pushing Romney figuring he’s the kind of “conservative” who won’t rock the boat too much.  But the rank and file Tea Party distrust Romney’s conservatism and this is why he’s having trouble despite all the money he’s spending on negative ads to sink his opponents.

Conservatives are encouraged by the surge in popularity for Santorum.  He doesn’t have the baggage of either Romney or Gingrich, so he’s viewed as more electable.  Romney, because he started Romneycare in Massachusetts, the pre-cursor to Obamacare, doesn’t strike the contrast with Obama’s policies that a Santorum or Gingrich would.

But just as important is he will energize the Republican base to get out and vote.  
If we had listened to the pollsters and the press, the race would have been finished already and Romney crowned the winner.  In some senses, instincts are a better judge of what’s going to happen.

Dan Baker</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric,</p>
<p>It’s an interesting analysis.   But I wouldn’t paint the picture so dark for Republicans, nor that bright for Obama either. </p>
<p>The media and Republican elite have been pushing Romney figuring he’s the kind of “conservative” who won’t rock the boat too much.  But the rank and file Tea Party distrust Romney’s conservatism and this is why he’s having trouble despite all the money he’s spending on negative ads to sink his opponents.</p>
<p>Conservatives are encouraged by the surge in popularity for Santorum.  He doesn’t have the baggage of either Romney or Gingrich, so he’s viewed as more electable.  Romney, because he started Romneycare in Massachusetts, the pre-cursor to Obamacare, doesn’t strike the contrast with Obama’s policies that a Santorum or Gingrich would.</p>
<p>But just as important is he will energize the Republican base to get out and vote.<br />
If we had listened to the pollsters and the press, the race would have been finished already and Romney crowned the winner.  In some senses, instincts are a better judge of what’s going to happen.</p>
<p>Dan Baker</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who Makes Jobs? Maybe Newt, Maybe Not by Dan Baker</title>
		<link>http://halfthoughts.com/2012/01/08/who-makes-jobs-maybe-newt-maybe-not/#comment-14919</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 19:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://halfthoughts.com/?p=3494#comment-14919</guid>
		<description>Eric,

I was searching for a good picture on the theme of Revenue Assurance using Google Image Search and found Newt\\\&#039;s picture being posted.   I was curious about the association till I clicked and found your site.

And I write this the day after Newt had his big victory in South Carolina.

I think you&#039;re right to perceive that the only thing consistent about the candidates is that they consistently flip flop. 

Newt probably hated to attack Mitt Romney on his Bain Capital experience.  But he figured the end justified the means because Romney&#039;s proxies attacked Gingrich in a very personal way in an ad campaign during the New Hampshire battle.   It was payback time, and this time the tactic succeeded.

I believe libertarianism is a powerful political philosophy -- less government intrusion and self-reliance.   People who oppose Ron Paul say his newsletter supported some fairly racist columns written by somebody else 20 years when he was a publisher.   I have not investigated that, but I find it curious that this \\&quot;racist stain\\&quot; is the only thing opponents are harping on.

People forget the racism that occurred when Justice Clarence Thomas was nominated to the Supreme Court 20 years ago.   So there\\\&#039;s a lot of distasteful guilt by accusation that goes on in American politics.  Herman Cain got treated the same way, although the personal attack made it easier for him to bail out when his ignorance of Libya exposed his foreign affairs weakness.

So those are three and a half thoughts. . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric,</p>
<p>I was searching for a good picture on the theme of Revenue Assurance using Google Image Search and found Newt\\\&#8217;s picture being posted.   I was curious about the association till I clicked and found your site.</p>
<p>And I write this the day after Newt had his big victory in South Carolina.</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re right to perceive that the only thing consistent about the candidates is that they consistently flip flop. </p>
<p>Newt probably hated to attack Mitt Romney on his Bain Capital experience.  But he figured the end justified the means because Romney&#8217;s proxies attacked Gingrich in a very personal way in an ad campaign during the New Hampshire battle.   It was payback time, and this time the tactic succeeded.</p>
<p>I believe libertarianism is a powerful political philosophy &#8212; less government intrusion and self-reliance.   People who oppose Ron Paul say his newsletter supported some fairly racist columns written by somebody else 20 years when he was a publisher.   I have not investigated that, but I find it curious that this \\&amp;quot;racist stain\\&amp;quot; is the only thing opponents are harping on.</p>
<p>People forget the racism that occurred when Justice Clarence Thomas was nominated to the Supreme Court 20 years ago.   So there\\\&#8217;s a lot of distasteful guilt by accusation that goes on in American politics.  Herman Cain got treated the same way, although the personal attack made it easier for him to bail out when his ignorance of Libya exposed his foreign affairs weakness.</p>
<p>So those are three and a half thoughts. . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Writing a Carol for Everyone by Vernon</title>
		<link>http://halfthoughts.com/2011/12/24/writing-a-carol-for-everyone/#comment-14761</link>
		<dc:creator>Vernon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 12:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://halfthoughts.com/?p=3423#comment-14761</guid>
		<description>Nice one Eric, thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one Eric, thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Carol for Everyone by vernon</title>
		<link>http://halfthoughts.com/videos/carol-for-everyone/#comment-14760</link>
		<dc:creator>vernon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 12:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://halfthoughts.com/?post_type=video&#038;p=3430#comment-14760</guid>
		<description>nice one Eric, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice one Eric, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Writing a Carol for Everyone by claire</title>
		<link>http://halfthoughts.com/2011/12/24/writing-a-carol-for-everyone/#comment-14757</link>
		<dc:creator>claire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 13:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://halfthoughts.com/?p=3423#comment-14757</guid>
		<description>Happy Christmas Eric. I like your carol x x</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy Christmas Eric. I like your carol x x</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Derren Brown: Magician or Charlatan? by Eddie</title>
		<link>http://halfthoughts.com/2009/09/12/derren-brown-magician-or-charlatan/#comment-14371</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://halfthoughts.com/?p=1183#comment-14371</guid>
		<description>Generally I&#039;ve enjoyed Derren Brown&#039;s TV programmes in the past. The Lottery episode was a massive disappointment to me - and presumably everyone who has any video editing skills. I guessed from the set-up, in the first 5 minutes that he was going to use a split screen effect, augmented by fake handheld camera movement, and he did. (The only reason to have a camera shot from rear of the studio was to reinforce the idea that camera one was handheld throughout). 
We went to see the enigma stage show. He is undoubtedly a great showman, but I was glad that I hadn&#039;t been one of the many audience members who wasted their time by going to the edge of the stage in the interval to write a list of their 5 favourite things - clearly from the &#039;reveal&#039; at the end of the show (explained in a McFly pre-recorded video)- none of this information was used.
Apart from the dubious ethics of some of his tv tricks (e.g. the &#039;out of the body&#039; car accident illusion), my main criticism is his assertion that what he does is &#039;part illusion, part psychology, part mind control&#039; etcetera. This is only marginally true. It was clear from seeing his act, that what he does is 98% standard illusion, and 2% suggestion. People are fooled into believing they&#039;ve been subtly manipulated by words and images in full view - when in fact he&#039;s more often than not simply used illusion. This is a little disingenuous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generally I&#8217;ve enjoyed Derren Brown&#8217;s TV programmes in the past. The Lottery episode was a massive disappointment to me &#8211; and presumably everyone who has any video editing skills. I guessed from the set-up, in the first 5 minutes that he was going to use a split screen effect, augmented by fake handheld camera movement, and he did. (The only reason to have a camera shot from rear of the studio was to reinforce the idea that camera one was handheld throughout).<br />
We went to see the enigma stage show. He is undoubtedly a great showman, but I was glad that I hadn&#8217;t been one of the many audience members who wasted their time by going to the edge of the stage in the interval to write a list of their 5 favourite things &#8211; clearly from the &#8216;reveal&#8217; at the end of the show (explained in a McFly pre-recorded video)- none of this information was used.<br />
Apart from the dubious ethics of some of his tv tricks (e.g. the &#8216;out of the body&#8217; car accident illusion), my main criticism is his assertion that what he does is &#8216;part illusion, part psychology, part mind control&#8217; etcetera. This is only marginally true. It was clear from seeing his act, that what he does is 98% standard illusion, and 2% suggestion. People are fooled into believing they&#8217;ve been subtly manipulated by words and images in full view &#8211; when in fact he&#8217;s more often than not simply used illusion. This is a little disingenuous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on YouTube Pron by Eric Priezkalns</title>
		<link>http://halfthoughts.com/2011/10/16/youtube-pron/#comment-14365</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Priezkalns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 15:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://halfthoughts.com/?p=2705#comment-14365</guid>
		<description>Thanks Wendy!  The problem with writing a comedy blog is that you can&#039;t hear the audience reaction ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Wendy!  The problem with writing a comedy blog is that you can&#8217;t hear the audience reaction <img src='http://halfthoughts.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on YouTube Pron by Wendy</title>
		<link>http://halfthoughts.com/2011/10/16/youtube-pron/#comment-14364</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 12:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://halfthoughts.com/?p=2705#comment-14364</guid>
		<description>I can visualise the episode in my mind&#039;s eye. And, I laugh. Out loud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can visualise the episode in my mind&#8217;s eye. And, I laugh. Out loud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Six Unbankably Versatile Actors by Val</title>
		<link>http://halfthoughts.com/2011/08/06/six-untouchable-unbankables/#comment-13715</link>
		<dc:creator>Val</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 20:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://halfthoughts.com/?p=2526#comment-13715</guid>
		<description>As a mad Vincent D&#039;Onofrio fan, my only quibble with your assessment of him is your last line, that he may yet become a fan favourite. There are a lot of us out there for whom he is already the bee&#039;s knees!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a mad Vincent D&#8217;Onofrio fan, my only quibble with your assessment of him is your last line, that he may yet become a fan favourite. There are a lot of us out there for whom he is already the bee&#8217;s knees!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

